PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCY vs. EMBE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PCY vs. EMBE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PCY vs. EMBE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCY
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
-1.57%16.31%2.55%18.48%-24.47%-4.30%2.29%17.66%-6.16%9.71%
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
-2.86%25.90%-2.43%11.05%-25.61%-9.87%12.50%10.09%-12.68%23.42%
Different Trading Currencies

PCY is traded in USD, while EMBE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMBE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCY achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly higher than EMBE.L's -2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PCY has outperformed EMBE.L with an annualized return of 2.55%, while EMBE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.17% annualized return.


PCY

1D
0.53%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
-1.57%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
2.55%

EMBE.L

1D
1.57%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*
1.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PCY vs. EMBE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PCY and EMBE.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Return for Risk

PCY vs. EMBE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCY
PCY Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EMBE.L
EMBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCY vs. EMBE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCYEMBE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

1.33

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

2.04

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.82

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.12

6.95

-0.83

PCY vs. EMBE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCY Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCY and EMBE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCYEMBE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.33

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

-0.04

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.09

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.06

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between PCY and EMBE.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PCY vs. EMBE.L - Dividend Comparison

PCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, more than EMBE.L's 5.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCY
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
6.05%5.93%6.65%6.48%6.81%4.80%4.45%4.78%4.93%4.80%5.19%5.46%
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.62%5.44%5.64%5.50%5.39%3.92%3.85%4.77%5.75%3.88%5.36%4.72%

Drawdowns

PCY vs. EMBE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCY drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, which is greater than EMBE.L's maximum drawdown of -44.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCY and EMBE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PCYEMBE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.13%

-30.73%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.32%

-4.95%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-30.47%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.78%

-30.73%

-7.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.99%

-6.40%

+2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-7.44%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.11%

+0.64%

Volatility

PCY vs. EMBE.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) have volatilities of 4.03% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PCYEMBE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.24%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

6.42%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.22%

11.14%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.16%

13.61%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.92%

13.35%

-0.43%