PCTIX vs. ALCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO California Municipal Bond Fund (PCTIX) and AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio (ALCAX).
PCTIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on May 30, 2012. ALCAX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Dec 28, 1986.
Performance
PCTIX vs. ALCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCTIX vs. ALCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCTIX PIMCO California Municipal Bond Fund | -0.43% | 3.92% | 3.12% | 7.98% | -10.90% | 1.96% | 6.89% | 9.11% | 1.11% | 7.30% |
ALCAX AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio | -0.59% | 4.84% | 2.41% | 6.38% | -8.98% | 1.71% | 4.86% | 7.05% | 0.54% | 5.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCTIX achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly higher than ALCAX's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PCTIX has outperformed ALCAX with an annualized return of 2.66%, while ALCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.06% annualized return.
PCTIX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.66%
ALCAX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCTIX vs. ALCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCTIX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than ALCAX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCTIX vs. ALCAX — Risk / Return Rank
PCTIX
ALCAX
PCTIX vs. ALCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO California Municipal Bond Fund (PCTIX) and AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio (ALCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCTIX | ALCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.91 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.00 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | 3.17 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCTIX | ALCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.91 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.28 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.54 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.26 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCTIX and ALCAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCTIX vs. ALCAX - Dividend Comparison
PCTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, which matches ALCAX's 3.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCTIX PIMCO California Municipal Bond Fund | 3.38% | 3.60% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 1.97% | 1.76% | 2.01% | 2.63% | 2.97% | 3.04% | 2.95% | 2.81% |
ALCAX AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio | 3.37% | 4.38% | 3.15% | 2.84% | 2.43% | 1.61% | 2.74% | 3.35% | 3.63% | 3.21% | 3.38% | 3.37% |
Drawdowns
PCTIX vs. ALCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCTIX drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, which is greater than ALCAX's maximum drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCTIX and ALCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCTIX | ALCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.98% | -14.67% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | -4.57% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.98% | -14.31% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.98% | -14.31% | -2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -2.71% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -1.79% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.45% | +0.26% |
Volatility
PCTIX vs. ALCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO California Municipal Bond Fund (PCTIX) is 1.03%, while AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio (ALCAX) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that PCTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCTIX | ALCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 1.09% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.74% | 1.71% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.99% | 4.76% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 3.80% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 3.83% | +0.57% |