PCSGX vs. VRTGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PCSGX (PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments) and VRTGX (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCSGX returned 10.97%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for VRTGX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PCSGX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VRTGX.

Performance

PCSGX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCSGX achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly lower than VRTGX's 16.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PCSGX having a 10.97% annualized return and VRTGX not far ahead at 11.40%.

PCSGX

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 12.28%
• 6M: 10.50%
• 1Y: 21.18%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: 2.66%
• 10Y*: 10.97%

VRTGX

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 6M: 13.68%
• 1Y: 37.55%
• 3Y*: 18.22%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: 11.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSGX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCSGX PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments	12.28%	2.00%	12.20%	15.89%	-26.58%	14.91%	38.85%	24.05%	0.33%	23.26%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	16.85%	12.97%	15.26%	18.80%	-26.30%	2.82%	34.81%	28.84%	-9.21%	22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PCSGX and VRTGX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010	0.96

The correlation between PCSGX and VRTGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (1 year) to 0.96 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCSGX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCSGX

PCSGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
PCSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PCSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
PCSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
PCSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
PCSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

VRTGX

VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 39
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCSGX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCSGX	VRTGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.77	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.45	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.29	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	2.55	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.20	9.17	-2.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCSGX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCSGX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCSGX	VRTGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	1.77	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.23	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.47	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.51	-0.07

Drawdowns

PCSGX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSGX and VRTGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCSGX	VRTGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.32%	-41.97%	-14.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.48%	-14.80%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.64%	-28.54%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.48%	-40.48%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.35%	-41.97%	+2.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-1.38%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.40%	-10.43%	-1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	4.10%	-0.47%

Volatility

PCSGX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) is 5.04%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that PCSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCSGX	VRTGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	6.62%	-1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.93%	15.82%	-0.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.57%	21.42%	-1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.85%	24.56%	-1.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.84%	24.51%	-1.67%

PCSGX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCSGX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

PCSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than VRTGX's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCSGX PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments	5.70%	6.40%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	45.92%	6.50%	15.70%	20.15%	5.56%	0.00%	25.13%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.61%	0.57%	0.62%	0.85%	0.78%	0.54%	0.53%	0.90%	0.85%	0.75%	1.07%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCSGX and VRTGX in my portfolio?

PCSGX and VRTGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCSGX or VRTGX?

VRTGX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to PCSGX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCSGX dropped -56.32% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.