PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCSGX vs. VISGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCSGX vs. VISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCSGX achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly lower than VISGX's 17.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PCSGX has underperformed VISGX with an annualized return of 10.97%, while VISGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return.


PCSGX

1D
-1.27%
1M
2.46%
YTD
12.28%
6M
10.50%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*
10.97%

VISGX

1D
-1.07%
1M
3.63%
YTD
17.40%
6M
15.62%
1Y
31.96%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSGX vs. VISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCSGX
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments
12.28%2.00%12.20%15.89%-26.58%14.91%38.85%24.05%0.33%23.26%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
17.40%8.18%14.80%22.91%-28.50%5.58%35.11%32.60%-5.81%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PCSGX and VISGX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 1998

0.95

The correlation between PCSGX and VISGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (1 year) to 0.96 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCSGX vs. VISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCSGX
PCSGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PCSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PCSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VISGX
VISGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCSGX vs. VISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCSGXVISGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.87

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

10.92

-4.73

PCSGX vs. VISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the VISGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCSGX and VISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCSGXVISGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.68

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.24

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.39

+0.05

Drawdowns

PCSGX vs. VISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, roughly equal to the maximum VISGX drawdown of -58.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSGX and VISGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCSGXVISGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.32%

-58.74%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-11.39%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.64%

-27.58%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.48%

-38.41%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.35%

-38.70%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.07%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-11.61%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

2.98%

+0.65%

Volatility

PCSGX vs. VISGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) is 5.04%, while Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that PCSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCSGXVISGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

5.46%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.93%

14.84%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

19.48%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

23.56%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

22.98%

-0.14%

PCSGX vs. VISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than VISGX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCSGX vs. VISGX - Dividend Comparison

PCSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than VISGX's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCSGX
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments
5.70%6.40%3.06%0.00%0.00%45.92%6.50%15.70%20.15%5.56%0.00%25.13%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.34%0.33%0.42%0.56%0.46%0.23%0.35%0.47%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCSGX and VISGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VISGX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to PCSGX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCSGX dropped -56.32% vs VISGX's -58.74%.

VISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCSGX and VISGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer