PCSGX vs. NESIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX).

PCSGX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995. NESIX is managed by Needham. It was launched on Dec 30, 2016.

Performance

PCSGX vs. NESIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PCSGX vs. NESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCSGX PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments	-9.66%	2.00%	12.20%	15.89%	-26.58%	14.91%	38.85%	24.05%	0.33%	22.55%
NESIX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional	9.63%	11.16%	13.47%	5.85%	-29.71%	11.36%	73.06%	55.28%	-4.87%	12.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCSGX achieves a -9.66% return, which is significantly lower than NESIX's 9.63% return.

PCSGX

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -9.66%
• YTD: -9.66%
• 6M: -9.00%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 3.83%
• 5Y*: -1.42%
• 10Y*: 9.03%

NESIX

• 1D: -4.46%
• 1M: -7.08%
• YTD: 9.63%
• 6M: 12.40%
• 1Y: 48.73%
• 3Y*: 11.47%
• 5Y*: 1.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSGX vs. NESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NESIX's 1.18% expense ratio.

NESIX

Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional

PCSGX

PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments

Return for Risk

PCSGX vs. NESIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCSGX

PCSGX Risk / Return Rank: 7
PCSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PCSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
PCSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
PCSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PCSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

NESIX

NESIX Risk / Return Rank: 78
NESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
NESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCSGX vs. NESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCSGX	NESIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	1.34	-1.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	1.91	-1.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.25	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	2.44	-2.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.21	8.21	-8.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCSGX vs. NESIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the NESIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCSGX and NESIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCSGX	NESIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	1.34	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	0.04	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.53	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between PCSGX and NESIX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PCSGX vs. NESIX - Dividend Comparison

PCSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, while NESIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCSGX PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments	7.09%	6.40%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	45.92%	6.50%	15.70%	20.15%	5.56%	0.00%	25.13%
NESIX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.93%	23.92%	13.26%	8.25%	21.96%	8.89%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PCSGX vs. NESIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSGX drawdown since its inception was -74.84%, which is greater than NESIX's maximum drawdown of -49.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSGX and NESIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCSGX	NESIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.84%	-49.61%	-25.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.48%	-17.25%	+3.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.48%	-49.61%	+12.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.85%	-9.15%	-9.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.05%	-15.27%	-7.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	5.12%	-0.55%

Volatility

PCSGX vs. NESIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) is 6.48%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that PCSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCSGX	NESIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	10.99%	-4.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	22.90%	-8.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.56%	35.06%	-11.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.77%	29.10%	-6.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.77%	26.30%	-3.53%