PCSFX vs. FPF
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX) and First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund (FPF).
PCSFX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Mar 13, 2014. FPF is managed by First Trust. It was launched on Apr 1, 2009.
Performance
PCSFX vs. FPF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCSFX vs. FPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSFX Principal Capital Securities Fund | -1.42% | 8.96% | 12.15% | 6.82% | -11.35% | 3.74% | 7.71% | 17.41% | -4.61% | 11.57% |
FPF First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund | -4.04% | 13.14% | 20.90% | 5.31% | -25.83% | 9.12% | 9.67% | 28.24% | -11.97% | 15.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCSFX achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly higher than FPF's -4.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PCSFX having a 5.44% annualized return and FPF not far ahead at 5.68%.
PCSFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
FPF
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 6M
- -3.83%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCSFX vs. FPF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCSFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FPF's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PCSFX vs. FPF — Risk / Return Rank
PCSFX
FPF
PCSFX vs. FPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX) and First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund (FPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCSFX | FPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 0.39 | +1.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 0.56 | +2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.10 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 0.44 | +1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 1.35 | +7.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCSFX | FPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 0.39 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.14 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | 0.23 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.24 | +0.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCSFX and FPF is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCSFX vs. FPF - Dividend Comparison
PCSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, less than FPF's 9.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSFX Principal Capital Securities Fund | 5.63% | 5.80% | 5.50% | 5.75% | 5.68% | 4.57% | 4.88% | 5.43% | 6.07% | 5.14% | 5.08% | 5.78% |
FPF First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund | 9.36% | 8.85% | 9.17% | 8.31% | 8.62% | 6.75% | 6.55% | 7.08% | 8.79% | 7.63% | 9.31% | 9.16% |
Drawdowns
PCSFX vs. FPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCSFX drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum FPF drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSFX and FPF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCSFX | FPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -53.78% | +31.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -10.17% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -37.06% | +18.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.42% | -53.78% | +31.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -7.99% | +5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -8.49% | +5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 3.33% | -2.67% |
Volatility
PCSFX vs. FPF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX) is 1.15%, while First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund (FPF) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that PCSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCSFX | FPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 5.15% | -4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | 6.68% | -5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 12.01% | -9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 14.55% | -10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 25.00% | -19.96% |