PCS vs. VTC
PCS (PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF) and VTC (Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PCS is actively managed, while VTC is passively managed. Over the past year, PCS returned 3.68% vs 1.74% for VTC. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PCS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTC.
Performance
PCS vs. VTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCS achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than VTC's -0.67% return.
PCS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VTC
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 1Y
- 1.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.09K | $30.68K | $31.15K | |
| $4.41M | $5.24M | $7.07M |
PCS vs. VTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF | 1.43% | 2.22% |
VTC Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF | -0.67% | 3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCS and VTC is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCS vs. VTC — Risk / Return Rank
PCS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTC
PCS vs. VTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCS | VTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCS vs. VTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCS drawdown since its inception was -1.12%, smaller than the maximum VTC drawdown of -22.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCS and VTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCS | VTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -22.05% | +20.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.12% | -2.88% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -2.24% | +2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -5.76% | +5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility
PCS vs. VTC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCS | VTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58% | 4.31% | -2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 7.08% | -5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 7.63% | -6.05% |
PCS vs. VTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTC's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PCS vs. VTC - Dividend Comparison
PCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than VTC's 5.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF | 4.78% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTC Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.76% | 4.50% | 3.80% | 3.13% | 2.36% | 2.69% | 3.34% | 3.53% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCS and VTC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, PCS leads with 3.68% vs 1.74% for VTC. On fees, VTC is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PCS has performed better with a 3.68% return vs 1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTC is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PCS.
PCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.59% for VTC.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PCS and 0.03% for VTC.
Find the right allocation for PCS and VTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer