PCS vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PCS (PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. PCS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

PCS vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PCS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.25%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCS vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF	0.76%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

PCS vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCS	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.64	—	—

Drawdowns

PCS vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCS drawdown since its inception was -1.12%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCS and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCS	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.12%	0.00%	-1.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCS	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59%	0.00%	+1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.59%	0.00%	+1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.59%	0.00%	+1.59%

PCS vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCS vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

PCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF	4.01%	1.92%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PCS or QCON?

On fees, PCS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCS or QCON?

PCS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCS or QCON?

PCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between PCS and QCON?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PCS and 0.32% for QCON.