PCS vs. BBCB
PCS (PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF) and BBCB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PCS is actively managed, while BBCB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBCB.
Performance
PCS vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCS achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.94% return.
PCS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBCB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.91%
- 1Y
- 7.89%
- 3Y*
- 6.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
PCS vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF | 1.25% | 2.22% |
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 2.94% | 2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCS and BBCB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCS vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank
PCS
BBCB
PCS vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCS | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.64 | 0.46 | +2.18 |
Drawdowns
PCS vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCS drawdown since its inception was -1.12%, smaller than the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCS and BBCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCS | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -22.48% | +21.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.23% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -6.66% | +6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.83% | — |
Volatility
PCS vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCS | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59% | 4.93% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.59% | 7.25% | -5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.59% | 7.49% | -5.90% |
PCS vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PCS vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison
PCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than BBCB's 7.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 7.14% | 5.02% | 5.22% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.47% | 4.59% | 5.25% | 0.20% |
PCS PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF | 4.01% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCS and BBCB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PCS.
BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 4.01% for PCS.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PCS and 0.09% for BBCB.
Find the right allocation for PCS and BBCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer