PCOM.DE vs. WQTM.DE
PCOM.DE (WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF) and WQTM.DE (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - PCOM.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity, while WQTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. PCOM.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WQTM.DE.
Performance
PCOM.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCOM.DE achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly lower than WQTM.DE's 50.87% return.
PCOM.DE
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 37.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 21.19%
- YTD
- 50.87%
- 6M
- 43.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCOM.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCOM.DE WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF | 25.30% | 9.69% |
WQTM.DE WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 50.87% | 22.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCOM.DE and WQTM.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCOM.DE vs. WQTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PCOM.DE
WQTM.DE
PCOM.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (PCOM.DE) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WQTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCOM.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCOM.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 3.21 | -2.56 |
Drawdowns
PCOM.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCOM.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.22%, which is greater than WQTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCOM.DE and WQTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCOM.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.22% | -24.12% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -3.88% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -10.07% | -5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | — | — |
Volatility
PCOM.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCOM.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 39.69% | -20.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 39.69% | -21.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 39.69% | -21.93% |
PCOM.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCOM.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than WQTM.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCOM.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PCOM.DE nor WQTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PCOM.DE and WQTM.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCOM.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCOM.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
PCOM.DE is categorized as Commodities, while WQTM.DE is Technology Equities. PCOM.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while WQTM.DE tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PCOM.DE and 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for PCOM.DE and WQTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer