PCMNX vs. USIAX
PCMNX (PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments) and USIAX (UBS Ultra Short Income Fund) are both mutual funds - PCMNX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by UBS, while USIAX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by UBS. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PCMNX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USIAX.
Performance
PCMNX vs. USIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PCMNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 1.89%
USIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCMNX vs. USIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments | 0.16% |
USIAX UBS Ultra Short Income Fund | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCMNX and USIAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCMNX vs. USIAX — Risk / Return Rank
PCMNX
USIAX
PCMNX vs. USIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) and UBS Ultra Short Income Fund (USIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCMNX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.99 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.56 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.82 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCMNX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 19.58 | -18.32 |
Drawdowns
PCMNX vs. USIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCMNX drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, which is greater than USIAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCMNX and USIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCMNX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | 0.00% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | 0.00% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | 0.00% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility
PCMNX vs. USIAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCMNX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26% | 3.65% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 3.65% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 3.65% | -0.30% |
PCMNX vs. USIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCMNX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than USIAX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCMNX vs. USIAX - Dividend Comparison
PCMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than USIAX's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments | 2.83% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 2.37% | 2.30% | 2.38% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 3.11% | 2.89% | 3.33% | 3.23% |
USIAX UBS Ultra Short Income Fund | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, PCMNX and USIAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for PCMNX and USIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer