PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCMNX vs. PRMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCMNX vs. PRMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) and T. Rowe Price Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (PRMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PCMNX having a 1.04% return and PRMDX slightly higher at 1.07%. Over the past 10 years, PCMNX has outperformed PRMDX with an annualized return of 1.89%, while PRMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.


PCMNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.44%
1Y
6.42%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
1.89%

PRMDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.72%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
1.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCMNX vs. PRMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCMNX
PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments
1.04%4.52%0.85%5.54%-7.30%0.70%4.63%7.32%0.85%4.71%
PRMDX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
1.07%4.51%2.64%3.59%-2.29%0.30%1.15%2.52%0.98%1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PCMNX and PRMDX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

0.40

The correlation between PCMNX and PRMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCMNX vs. PRMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCMNX
PCMNX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PCMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PCMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PRMDX
PRMDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PRMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCMNX vs. PRMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) and T. Rowe Price Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (PRMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCMNXPRMDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.99

2.87

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.56

5.66

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

2.46

-0.64

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

4.48

-2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.77

15.27

-7.49

PCMNX vs. PRMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the PRMDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCMNX and PRMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCMNXPRMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

2.87

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

1.08

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.89

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

1.44

-0.18

Drawdowns

PCMNX vs. PRMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCMNX drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, which is greater than PRMDX's maximum drawdown of -4.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCMNX and PRMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCMNXPRMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-4.31%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-0.96%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.41%

-1.56%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.62%

-4.31%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.62%

-4.31%

-7.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

0.00%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-0.37%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.28%

+0.55%

Volatility

PCMNX vs. PRMDX - Volatility Comparison

PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to T. Rowe Price Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (PRMDX) at 0.64%. This indicates that PCMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCMNXPRMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

0.64%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

1.16%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

1.51%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.07%

1.73%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

1.63%

+1.72%

PCMNX vs. PRMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCMNX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than PRMDX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCMNX vs. PRMDX - Dividend Comparison

PCMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than PRMDX's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCMNX
PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments
2.83%2.49%2.58%2.37%2.30%2.38%2.47%3.41%3.11%2.89%3.33%3.23%
PRMDX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
3.64%3.43%3.00%1.93%0.61%0.69%1.14%1.33%1.16%0.89%0.74%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCMNX and PRMDX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCMNX has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to PRMDX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCMNX dropped -11.62% vs PRMDX's -4.31%.

PCMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCMNX and PRMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer