PCMNX vs. PCEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) and PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX).
PCMNX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 23, 1995. PCEMX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 23, 1995.
Performance
PCMNX vs. PCEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCMNX vs. PCEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments | -0.51% | 4.52% | 0.85% | 5.54% | -7.30% | 0.70% | 4.63% | 7.32% | 0.85% | 4.71% |
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments | 0.24% | 36.75% | 4.15% | 10.33% | -18.97% | -1.79% | 20.13% | 19.01% | -16.42% | 34.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCMNX achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than PCEMX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PCMNX has underperformed PCEMX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while PCEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.49% annualized return.
PCMNX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
PCEMX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -14.42%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 4.50%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCMNX vs. PCEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCMNX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEMX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCMNX vs. PCEMX — Risk / Return Rank
PCMNX
PCEMX
PCMNX vs. PCEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) and PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCMNX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.82 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 2.31 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 2.34 | -1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 8.95 | -7.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCMNX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.82 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.24 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.44 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.23 | +1.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCMNX and PCEMX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PCMNX vs. PCEMX - Dividend Comparison
PCMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than PCEMX's 4.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments | 2.82% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 2.37% | 2.30% | 2.38% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 3.11% | 2.89% | 3.33% | 3.23% |
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments | 4.89% | 4.91% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 2.52% | 11.70% | 1.10% | 1.04% | 1.84% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
PCMNX vs. PCEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCMNX drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum PCEMX drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCMNX and PCEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCMNX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -65.32% | +53.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.78% | -14.42% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.62% | -36.66% | +25.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.62% | -39.17% | +27.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -14.42% | +11.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -20.98% | +19.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 3.82% | -2.50% |
Volatility
PCMNX vs. PCEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) is 1.00%, while PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that PCMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCMNX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 8.92% | -7.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.46% | 13.34% | -11.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 18.15% | -14.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.04% | 17.07% | -14.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 17.29% | -13.95% |