PCMNX vs. FXIEX
Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX).
PCMNX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 23, 1995. FXIEX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 24, 2012.
Performance
PCMNX vs. FXIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCMNX vs. FXIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments | -0.26% | 4.52% | 0.85% | 5.54% | -7.30% | 0.70% | 4.63% | 7.32% | 0.85% | 4.71% |
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE | -0.41% | 3.37% | 5.16% | 8.92% | -10.89% | 2.19% | 7.22% | 8.45% | 1.00% | 7.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCMNX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly higher than FXIEX's -0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PCMNX has underperformed FXIEX with an annualized return of 1.84%, while FXIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.78% annualized return.
PCMNX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 2.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 1.84%
FXIEX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCMNX vs. FXIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCMNX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FXIEX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCMNX vs. FXIEX — Risk / Return Rank
PCMNX
FXIEX
PCMNX vs. FXIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCMNX | FXIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.57 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 0.82 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.15 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.54 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.39 | 1.61 | +0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCMNX | FXIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.57 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.37 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.70 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.56 | +0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCMNX and FXIEX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PCMNX vs. FXIEX - Dividend Comparison
PCMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than FXIEX's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments | 2.81% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 2.37% | 2.30% | 2.38% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 3.11% | 2.89% | 3.33% | 3.23% |
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE | 2.03% | 2.75% | 4.53% | 3.98% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 3.37% | 3.63% | 3.79% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PCMNX vs. FXIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCMNX drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum FXIEX drawdown of -15.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCMNX and FXIEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCMNX | FXIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -15.25% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.78% | -5.11% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.62% | -15.25% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.62% | -15.25% | +3.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -2.01% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -2.92% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.84% | -0.65% |
Volatility
PCMNX vs. FXIEX - Volatility Comparison
PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) have volatilities of 1.05% and 1.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCMNX | FXIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 1.07% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.44% | 2.33% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 5.73% | -1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.04% | 4.30% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 4.07% | -0.73% |