PCLO vs. NFLT
PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) and NFLT (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Virtus, while NFLT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PCLO returned 5.30% vs 7.11% for NFLT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. PCLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NFLT.
Performance
PCLO vs. NFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLO achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than NFLT's 1.50% return.
PCLO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLT
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
PCLO vs. NFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 1.97% | 5.39% | 0.50% |
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.50% | 8.77% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLO and NFLT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLO vs. NFLT — Risk / Return Rank
PCLO
NFLT
PCLO vs. NFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCLO | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.94 | 1.78 | +4.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 10.34 | 2.60 | +7.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.76 | 1.33 | +1.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.27 | 2.95 | +17.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 123.68 | 13.00 | +110.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCLO | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.94 | 1.78 | +4.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.62 | 0.84 | +3.78 |
Drawdowns
PCLO vs. NFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum NFLT drawdown of -15.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLO and NFLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLO | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -15.17% | +14.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.26% | -2.42% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -2.10% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.55% | -0.51% |
Volatility
PCLO vs. NFLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) is 0.25%, while Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that PCLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLO | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 1.19% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.70% | 2.90% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90% | 4.01% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.15% | 4.43% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.15% | 4.93% | -3.78% |
PCLO vs. NFLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLO vs. NFLT - Dividend Comparison
PCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, less than NFLT's 5.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 5.50% | 5.74% | 5.76% | 6.02% | 4.16% | 3.41% | 3.63% | 4.33% | 4.81% | 6.23% | 5.30% | 0.67% |
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 5.27% | 5.53% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLO and NFLT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLT has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to PCLO (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLO dropped -0.76% vs NFLT's -15.17%.
On 1-year performance, NFLT leads with 7.11% vs 5.30% for PCLO. On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PCLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NFLT has performed better with a 7.11% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NFLT.
NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 5.27% for PCLO.
PCLO is categorized as CLO, while NFLT is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PCLO and 0.50% for NFLT.
PCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCLO and NFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer