PCLN vs. EFFE
PCLN (Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF) and EFFE (Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF) are both Sustainable funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCLN charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for EFFE.
Performance
PCLN vs. EFFE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLN achieves a 23.46% return, which is significantly higher than EFFE's 14.94% return.
PCLN
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- YTD
- 23.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EFFE
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 14.94%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.43K | $1.59K | $7.87K | |
| $3.26K | $4.19K | $2.82K |
PCLN vs. EFFE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF | 23.46% | -1.27% |
EFFE Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF | 14.94% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLN and EFFE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLN vs. EFFE — Risk / Return Rank
PCLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EFFE
PCLN vs. EFFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF (PCLN) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCLN | EFFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCLN vs. EFFE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLN drawdown since its inception was -12.34%, smaller than the maximum EFFE drawdown of -14.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLN and EFFE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLN | EFFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.34% | -14.86% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.13% | -11.21% | +3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -2.56% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility
PCLN vs. EFFE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLN | EFFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.20% | 23.62% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 21.69% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 21.69% | +2.51% |
PCLN vs. EFFE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EFFE's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLN vs. EFFE - Dividend Comparison
PCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than EFFE's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EFFE Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF | 4.08% | 4.69% |
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLN and EFFE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EFFE is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EFFE is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PCLN.
EFFE has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.06% for PCLN.
They also come from different issuers: Pictet and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PCLN and 0.69% for EFFE.
Find the right allocation for PCLN and EFFE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer