PCLIX vs. TMCGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCLIX (PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund) and TMCGX (Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - PCLIX is a Commodities fund managed by PIMCO, while TMCGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 5 years, PCLIX returned 16.85%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for TMCGX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCLIX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for TMCGX.

Performance

PCLIX vs. TMCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLIX achieves a 36.81% return, which is significantly higher than TMCGX's 10.01% return.

PCLIX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 36.81%
• 6M: 35.82%
• 1Y: 46.35%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 16.85%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

TMCGX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 5.86%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 6M: 6.93%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: 10.41%
• 5Y*: 2.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLIX vs. TMCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	36.81%	5.76%	8.53%	0.69%	23.32%	43.83%	8.63%
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund	10.01%	2.48%	10.20%	16.94%	-28.27%	11.39%	53.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLIX and TMCGX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020	0.16

The correlation between PCLIX and TMCGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCLIX vs. TMCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCLIX

PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

TMCGX

TMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 12
TMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLIX vs. TMCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCLIX	TMCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	0.93	+1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	1.40	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.17	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.01	1.09	+5.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.91	3.60	+14.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCLIX vs. TMCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the TMCGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLIX and TMCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCLIX	TMCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	0.93	+1.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.13	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.40	-0.23

Drawdowns

PCLIX vs. TMCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLIX drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than TMCGX's maximum drawdown of -39.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLIX and TMCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLIX	TMCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.60%	-39.66%	-26.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.84%	-14.58%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.30%	-25.28%	+12.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.59%	-39.66%	+18.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.70%	-3.39%	-1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.15%	-15.94%	-8.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	4.42%	-1.75%

Volatility

PCLIX vs. TMCGX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) at 4.02%. This indicates that PCLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCLIX	TMCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.97%	4.02%	+2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.87%	13.76%	+3.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.49%	17.03%	+2.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.41%	22.25%	-2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.55%	24.19%	+16.36%

PCLIX vs. TMCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than TMCGX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCLIX vs. TMCGX - Dividend Comparison

PCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while TMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	1.37%	2.45%	7.50%	5.06%	42.60%	73.41%	0.77%	2.46%	18.58%	12.63%	0.16%	2.22%
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.13%	2.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLIX and TMCGX in my portfolio?

PCLIX and TMCGX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCLIX or TMCGX?

PCLIX has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to TMCGX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLIX dropped -66.60% vs TMCGX's -39.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.