PCLCX vs. USIAX
PCLCX (PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments) and USIAX (UBS Ultra Short Income Fund) are both mutual funds - PCLCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by UBS, while USIAX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by UBS. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCLCX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USIAX.
Performance
PCLCX vs. USIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PCLCX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 3.69%
- 1Y
- 14.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.88%
USIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCLCX vs. USIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | 1.24% |
USIAX UBS Ultra Short Income Fund | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLCX and USIAX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLCX vs. USIAX — Risk / Return Rank
PCLCX
USIAX
PCLCX vs. USIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) and UBS Ultra Short Income Fund (USIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCLCX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCLCX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 12.88 | -12.51 |
Drawdowns
PCLCX vs. USIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLCX drawdown since its inception was -63.98%, which is greater than USIAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLCX and USIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLCX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.98% | 0.00% | -63.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.34% | 0.00% | -20.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | — | — |
Volatility
PCLCX vs. USIAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLCX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.06% | 2.98% | +11.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.92% | 2.98% | +33.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 2.98% | +28.01% |
PCLCX vs. USIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than USIAX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLCX vs. USIAX - Dividend Comparison
PCLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.74%, more than USIAX's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | 19.74% | 20.66% | 11.94% | 2.09% | 60.17% | 22.81% | 18.38% | 16.53% | 22.05% | 10.32% | 3.30% | 17.60% |
USIAX UBS Ultra Short Income Fund | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLCX and USIAX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PCLCX and USIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer