PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLCX vs. ANFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PCLCX vs. ANFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PCLCX vs. ANFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCLCX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments
-10.04%9.86%28.05%35.17%-28.18%20.18%39.70%31.99%-3.18%29.89%
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
-5.56%30.96%23.52%29.10%-29.69%11.98%33.43%26.38%-4.41%34.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLCX achieves a -10.04% return, which is significantly lower than ANFFX's -5.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PCLCX having a 13.35% annualized return and ANFFX not far ahead at 13.45%.


PCLCX

1D
3.28%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
-10.04%
6M
-11.67%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
13.35%

ANFFX

1D
3.22%
1M
-8.17%
YTD
-5.56%
6M
1.11%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PCLCX vs. ANFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than ANFFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PCLCX vs. ANFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCLCX
PCLCX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PCLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ANFFX
ANFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ANFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ANFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLCX vs. ANFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCLCXANFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

1.51

-1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

2.16

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.30

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

2.30

-2.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.09

9.72

-9.81

PCLCX vs. ANFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the ANFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLCX and ANFFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCLCXANFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

1.51

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.45

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.71

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.48

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between PCLCX and ANFFX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PCLCX vs. ANFFX - Dividend Comparison

PCLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.96%, more than ANFFX's 10.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCLCX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments
22.96%20.66%11.94%2.09%60.17%22.81%18.38%16.53%22.05%10.32%3.30%17.60%
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
10.48%9.90%9.56%3.89%0.00%7.53%2.45%7.26%9.84%8.19%2.13%6.07%

Drawdowns

PCLCX vs. ANFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLCX drawdown since its inception was -63.98%, which is greater than ANFFX's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLCX and ANFFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLCXANFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.98%

-55.37%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.06%

-13.36%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.81%

-37.10%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.81%

-37.10%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.34%

-10.56%

-3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.42%

-11.43%

-8.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

3.16%

+2.36%

Volatility

PCLCX vs. ANFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) is 5.91%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that PCLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PCLCXANFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

7.51%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

13.55%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.66%

20.86%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.96%

19.21%

+17.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.97%

18.99%

+11.98%