PCHI vs. FSYD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PCHI (Polen High Income ETF) and FSYD (Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PCHI returned 4.22% vs 9.98% for FSYD. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCHI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FSYD.

Performance

PCHI vs. FSYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen High Income ETF (PCHI) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCHI achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than FSYD's 3.41% return.

PCHI

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 4.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSYD

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 6M: 4.01%
• 1Y: 9.98%
• 3Y*: 9.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCHI vs. FSYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCHI Polen High Income ETF	0.19%	5.15%
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	3.41%	7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PCHI and FSYD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025	0.47

The correlation between PCHI and FSYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PCHI vs. FSYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCHI

PCHI Risk / Return Rank: 29
PCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FSYD

FSYD Risk / Return Rank: 79
FSYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FSYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FSYD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FSYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FSYD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCHI vs. FSYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen High Income ETF (PCHI) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCHI	FSYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	2.44	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	3.72	-2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.49	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	3.75	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.48	15.02	-10.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCHI vs. FSYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the FSYD Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCHI and FSYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCHI	FSYD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	2.44	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.77	+0.07

Drawdowns

PCHI vs. FSYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCHI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum FSYD drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCHI and FSYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCHI	FSYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-12.11%	+9.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.44%	-2.67%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-0.20%	-1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-2.40%	+1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	0.67%	+0.27%

Volatility

PCHI vs. FSYD - Volatility Comparison

Polen High Income ETF (PCHI) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) at 1.11%. This indicates that PCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCHI	FSYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	1.11%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.23%	3.13%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.84%	4.11%	+0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.28%	7.85%	-2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.28%	7.85%	-2.57%

PCHI vs. FSYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCHI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FSYD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCHI vs. FSYD - Dividend Comparison

PCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, more than FSYD's 6.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	6.32%	6.49%	6.47%	6.70%	5.29%
PCHI Polen High Income ETF	8.08%	5.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCHI and FSYD in my portfolio?

PCHI and FSYD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCHI or FSYD?

PCHI has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to FSYD (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCHI dropped -2.99% vs FSYD's -12.11%.

Which ETF is better, PCHI or FSYD?

On 1-year performance, FSYD leads with 9.98% vs 4.22% for PCHI. On fees, FSYD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FSYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PCHI or FSYD?

Over the 1-year period, FSYD has performed better with a 9.98% return vs 4.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCHI or FSYD?

FSYD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PCHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCHI or FSYD?

PCHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.08%, compared with 6.32% for FSYD.

What is the main difference between PCHI and FSYD?

They also come from different issuers: Polen Capital and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PCHI and 0.55% for FSYD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.