PCHI vs. BBHY
PCHI (Polen High Income ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. PCHI is actively managed, while BBHY is passively managed. Over the past year, PCHI returned 4.22% vs 7.10% for BBHY. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCHI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.
Performance
PCHI vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCHI achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 1.73% return.
PCHI
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
PCHI vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCHI Polen High Income ETF | 0.19% | 5.15% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.73% | 6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCHI and BBHY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025 | 0.49 |
The correlation between PCHI and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCHI vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
PCHI
BBHY
PCHI vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen High Income ETF (PCHI) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCHI | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.39 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 3.00 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 13.50 | -9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCHI | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.97 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.64 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
PCHI vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCHI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCHI and BBHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCHI | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -24.98% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -2.37% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -0.14% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -2.37% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.53% | +0.41% |
Volatility
PCHI vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
Polen High Income ETF (PCHI) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that PCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCHI | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 1.13% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.23% | 2.85% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.84% | 3.62% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 7.26% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 7.53% | -2.25% |
PCHI vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCHI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCHI vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
PCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, more than BBHY's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.94% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
PCHI Polen High Income ETF | 8.08% | 5.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCHI and BBHY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCHI has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to BBHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCHI dropped -2.99% vs BBHY's -24.98%.
On 1-year performance, BBHY leads with 7.10% vs 4.22% for PCHI. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 7.10% return vs 4.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PCHI.
PCHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.08%, compared with 6.94% for BBHY.
They also come from different issuers: Polen Capital and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PCHI and 0.15% for BBHY.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCHI and BBHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer