PCGTX vs. CFBNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCGTX (PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments) and CFBNX (Commerce Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, PCGTX returned 1.55%/yr vs 1.93%/yr for CFBNX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCGTX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CFBNX.

Performance

PCGTX vs. CFBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and Commerce Bond Fund (CFBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCGTX achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than CFBNX's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PCGTX has underperformed CFBNX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while CFBNX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.93% annualized return.

PCGTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 3.30%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: 0.34%
• 10Y*: 1.55%

CFBNX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.28%
• 1Y: 5.48%
• 3Y*: 4.10%
• 5Y*: 0.22%
• 10Y*: 1.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCGTX vs. CFBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	3.02%	7.84%	0.98%	5.12%	-13.48%	-0.61%	5.75%	6.55%	0.17%	2.83%
CFBNX Commerce Bond Fund	0.41%	7.12%	1.52%	5.97%	-13.30%	-0.56%	7.15%	8.97%	-0.58%	4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PCGTX and CFBNX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995	0.78

The correlation between PCGTX and CFBNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (10 years) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCGTX vs. CFBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCGTX

PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 55
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CFBNX

CFBNX Risk / Return Rank: 24
CFBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CFBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CFBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CFBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CFBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCGTX vs. CFBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and Commerce Bond Fund (CFBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCGTX	CFBNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.40	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	2.10	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.25	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	1.83	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.48	5.39	+6.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCGTX vs. CFBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the CFBNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGTX and CFBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCGTX	CFBNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	1.40	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.04	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.41	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	1.07	-0.10

Drawdowns

PCGTX vs. CFBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGTX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than CFBNX's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGTX and CFBNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCGTX	CFBNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.34%	-17.90%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-2.98%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.94%	-5.72%	-2.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.20%	-17.90%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.34%	-17.90%	-1.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-1.47%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-2.11%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	1.01%	-0.09%

Volatility

PCGTX vs. CFBNX - Volatility Comparison

PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to Commerce Bond Fund (CFBNX) at 1.29%. This indicates that PCGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFBNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCGTX	CFBNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.85%	1.29%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.40%	2.79%	+1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.67%	3.88%	+1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.16%	5.56%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.39%	4.70%	+0.69%

PCGTX vs. CFBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCGTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than CFBNX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCGTX vs. CFBNX - Dividend Comparison

PCGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than CFBNX's 3.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFBNX Commerce Bond Fund	3.62%	3.54%	2.94%	2.67%	2.40%	3.02%	2.71%	3.14%	3.25%	3.23%	3.40%	3.52%
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	4.48%	3.78%	5.36%	5.02%	3.67%	2.87%	3.23%	3.53%	3.34%	2.96%	2.71%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCGTX and CFBNX in my portfolio?

PCGTX and CFBNX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCGTX or CFBNX?

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to CFBNX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCGTX dropped -19.34% vs CFBNX's -17.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.