PCEMX vs. USIAX
PCEMX (PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments) and USIAX (UBS Ultra Short Income Fund) are both mutual funds - PCEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by UBS, while USIAX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by UBS. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. PCEMX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USIAX.
Performance
PCEMX vs. USIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PCEMX
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 10.47%
- YTD
- 30.04%
- 6M
- 32.30%
- 1Y
- 60.94%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
USIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCEMX vs. USIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments | 3.44% |
USIAX UBS Ultra Short Income Fund | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCEMX and USIAX is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCEMX vs. USIAX — Risk / Return Rank
PCEMX
USIAX
PCEMX vs. USIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) and UBS Ultra Short Income Fund (USIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCEMX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.75 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.53 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCEMX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 12.88 | -12.60 |
Drawdowns
PCEMX vs. USIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCEMX drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than USIAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEMX and USIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCEMX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | 0.00% | -65.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | 0.00% | -20.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | — | — |
Volatility
PCEMX vs. USIAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCEMX | USIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.88% | 2.98% | +14.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 2.98% | +14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 2.98% | +14.52% |
PCEMX vs. USIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCEMX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USIAX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCEMX vs. USIAX - Dividend Comparison
PCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than USIAX's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments | 3.77% | 4.91% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 2.52% | 11.70% | 1.10% | 1.04% | 1.84% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.09% |
USIAX UBS Ultra Short Income Fund | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCEMX and USIAX have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PCEMX and USIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer