PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCEMX vs. BADEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCEMX vs. BADEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCEMX achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly higher than BADEX's 16.77% return.


PCEMX

1D
-3.45%
1M
1.60%
YTD
24.23%
6M
25.04%
1Y
48.36%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
10.10%

BADEX

1D
-3.30%
1M
2.11%
YTD
16.77%
6M
16.77%
1Y
23.16%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEMX vs. BADEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PCEMX
PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments
24.23%36.75%4.15%10.33%-18.97%-1.79%2.71%
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
16.77%13.95%10.15%11.67%-11.34%4.49%2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PCEMX and BADEX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.81

The correlation between PCEMX and BADEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCEMX vs. BADEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEMX
PCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BADEX
BADEX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BADEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BADEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BADEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BADEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BADEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEMX vs. BADEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCEMXBADEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.44

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

2.87

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.60

11.01

+3.60

PCEMX vs. BADEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the BADEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCEMX and BADEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCEMX vs. BADEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEMX drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than BADEX's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEMX and BADEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCEMXBADEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.32%

-21.86%

-43.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.42%

-8.89%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-10.29%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.85%

-21.15%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-3.52%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.84%

-5.59%

-15.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

2.32%

+1.42%

Volatility

PCEMX vs. BADEX - Volatility Comparison

PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX) at 7.19%. This indicates that PCEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BADEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCEMXBADEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

7.19%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.40%

11.04%

+6.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.73%

12.07%

+7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

10.60%

+7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

10.69%

+6.93%

PCEMX vs. BADEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEMX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BADEX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCEMX vs. BADEX - Dividend Comparison

PCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than BADEX's 6.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
6.44%7.52%2.27%1.92%2.43%7.54%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PCEMX
PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments
3.95%4.91%1.22%1.44%2.52%11.70%1.10%1.04%1.84%1.16%1.09%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCEMX and BADEX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCEMX has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to BADEX (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCEMX dropped -65.32% vs BADEX's -21.86%.

PCEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCEMX and BADEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer