PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCCOX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCCOX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class (PCCOX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PCCOX having a 12.13% return and FSKAX slightly lower at 12.08%.


PCCOX

1D
0.28%
1M
5.69%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.21%
1Y
28.59%
3Y*
23.33%
5Y*
14.84%
10Y*

FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCCOX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCCOX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class
12.13%16.49%26.56%29.93%-18.71%28.17%19.96%33.13%-4.55%23.01%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PCCOX and FSKAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.98

The correlation between PCCOX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCCOX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCCOX
PCCOX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PCCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PCCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCCOX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class (PCCOX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCCOXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.46

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

3.35

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.38

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.88

15.52

-0.64

PCCOX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCCOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCCOX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCCOXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.46

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.76

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.85

+0.03

Drawdowns

PCCOX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCCOX drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, roughly equal to the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCCOX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCCOXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.42%

-35.01%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-8.92%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.37%

-19.43%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-25.39%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-4.02%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.94%

+0.04%

Volatility

PCCOX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class (PCCOX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) have volatilities of 3.06% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCCOXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.97%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

9.23%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

12.26%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

17.41%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

18.46%

+0.25%

PCCOX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCCOX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCCOX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

PCCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
PCCOX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class
1.10%1.23%0.71%1.22%1.38%3.78%1.12%1.45%5.77%7.18%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PCCOX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PCCOX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to FSKAX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCCOX dropped -34.42% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

PCCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCCOX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer