PCBAX vs. QSPRX
PCBAX (BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund) and QSPRX (AQR Style Premia Alternative R6) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 10 years, PCBAX returned 5.79%/yr vs 7.87%/yr for QSPRX. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PCBAX charges 1.08%/yr vs 5.79%/yr for QSPRX.
Performance
PCBAX vs. QSPRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCBAX achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than QSPRX's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PCBAX has underperformed QSPRX with an annualized return of 5.79%, while QSPRX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.87% annualized return.
PCBAX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 11.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 5.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.30%
QSPRX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 20.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PCBAX vs. QSPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 10.12% | 6.16% | 11.77% | 2.37% | 5.77% | 0.29% | 6.50% | 1.41% | 4.32% | 7.71% |
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 17.68% | 14.94% | 21.60% | 12.50% | 30.90% | 25.14% | -21.91% | -8.10% | -12.32% | 12.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCBAX and QSPRX is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCBAX vs. QSPRX — Risk / Return Rank
PCBAX
QSPRX
PCBAX vs. QSPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCBAX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.40 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 4.39 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 11.98 | -3.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCBAX vs. QSPRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.55%, roughly equal to the maximum QSPRX drawdown of -41.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCBAX and QSPRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCBAX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -41.22% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -5.06% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.75% | -9.25% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.75% | -17.17% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.00% | -41.22% | +32.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -9.95% | +5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 1.85% | -0.58% |
Volatility
PCBAX vs. QSPRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) is 1.63%, while AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that PCBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCBAX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 2.23% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 7.12% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.78% | 9.63% | -3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.47% | 15.89% | -9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 12.89% | -6.79% |
PCBAX vs. QSPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCBAX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QSPRX's 5.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCBAX vs. QSPRX - Dividend Comparison
PCBAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.67% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 2.44% | 3.08% | 9.91% | 0.80% | 1.41% | 4.86% |
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 2.24% | 2.63% | 6.99% | 23.75% | 22.67% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 7.15% | 1.74% | 5.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCBAX and QSPRX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSPRX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to PCBAX (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCBAX dropped -39.55% vs QSPRX's -41.22%.
QSPRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCBAX and QSPRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer