PCBAX vs. DVRIX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) and MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund (DVRIX).
PCBAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 28, 1988. DVRIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 19, 2007.
Performance
PCBAX vs. DVRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCBAX vs. DVRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 3.41% | 6.16% | 11.77% | 2.37% | 5.77% | 0.29% | 6.50% | 1.41% | 4.32% | 7.71% |
DVRIX MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund | 0.35% | 10.87% | 9.66% | 9.22% | -5.10% | 3.67% | 4.66% | 13.01% | -0.39% | 6.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCBAX achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than DVRIX's 0.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PCBAX having a 5.06% annualized return and DVRIX not far behind at 4.93%.
PCBAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 5.06%
DVRIX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 6.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCBAX vs. DVRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCBAX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than DVRIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCBAX vs. DVRIX — Risk / Return Rank
PCBAX
DVRIX
PCBAX vs. DVRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) and MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund (DVRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCBAX | DVRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.91 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 1.93 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | 8.15 | -1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCBAX | DVRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 1.17 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.95 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.42 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCBAX and DVRIX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PCBAX vs. DVRIX - Dividend Comparison
PCBAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DVRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.67% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 2.44% | 3.08% | 9.91% | 0.80% | 1.41% | 4.86% |
DVRIX MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund | 1.14% | 1.15% | 1.65% | 1.15% | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.64% | 1.14% | 1.11% | 2.17% | 2.87% | 1.15% |
Drawdowns
PCBAX vs. DVRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.55%, which is greater than DVRIX's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCBAX and DVRIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCBAX | DVRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -36.61% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.29% | -3.45% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.75% | -9.88% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.00% | -12.80% | +3.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -2.05% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -4.13% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 0.82% | +0.53% |
Volatility
PCBAX vs. DVRIX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund (DVRIX) at 1.66%. This indicates that PCBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCBAX | DVRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 1.66% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.40% | 2.79% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.76% | 4.81% | +1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.45% | 4.84% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 5.22% | +0.90% |