PBW vs. GRPZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) and GRPZ (Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from Invesco - PBW tracks the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX) while GRPZ tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PBW returned 48.80% vs 30.97% for GRPZ. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBW charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GRPZ.

Performance

PBW vs. GRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBW achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than GRPZ's 23.85% return.

PBW

• 1D: -4.27%
• 1M: -15.98%
• 6M: -3.48%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 1Y: 48.80%
• 3Y*: -6.65%
• 5Y*: -14.11%
• 10Y*: 7.36%

GRPZ

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 7.28%
• 6M: 16.11%
• YTD: 23.85%
• 1Y: 30.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBW vs. GRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	10.21%	53.96%	-5.79%
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF	23.85%	3.09%	4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PBW and GRPZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.56

The correlation between PBW and GRPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBW vs. GRPZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBW	GRPZ
Industrials	28.0%	16.1%
Basic Materials	13.5%	2.3%
Energy	12.9%	12.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	11.8%
Technology	9.9%	7.6%
Utilities	8.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	5.3%
Financial Services	1.3%	28.3%
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Healthcare	-	15.8%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

PBW vs. GRPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBW

PBW Risk / Return Rank: 38
PBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
PBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PBW Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PBW Martin Ratio Rank: 38

GRPZ

GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBW vs. GRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBW	GRPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.77	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.70	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.30	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	3.27	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.87	9.39	-4.51

PBW vs. GRPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBW Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the GRPZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBW and GRPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBW vs. GRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBW drawdown since its inception was -89.02%, which is greater than GRPZ's maximum drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBW and GRPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBW	GRPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.02%	-27.87%	-61.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.44%	-9.53%	-18.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.23%	0.00%	-72.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.92%	-6.68%	-56.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.04%	3.31%	+6.73%

Volatility

PBW vs. GRPZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a higher volatility of 13.46% compared to Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) at 3.78%. This indicates that PBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBW	GRPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.46%	3.78%	+9.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.32%	11.77%	+20.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.37%	17.53%	+25.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.54%	20.87%	+22.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.11%	20.87%	+18.24%

PBW vs. GRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GRPZ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBW vs. GRPZ - Dividend Comparison

PBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than GRPZ's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF	0.87%	0.97%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	1.41%	0.79%	2.84%	3.68%	4.21%	1.71%	0.44%	1.45%	2.04%	1.28%	2.68%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBW and GRPZ in my portfolio?

PBW and GRPZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBW or GRPZ?

PBW has higher volatility (13.46%) compared to GRPZ (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBW dropped -89.02% vs GRPZ's -27.87%.

Which ETF is better, PBW or GRPZ?

On 1-year performance, PBW leads with 48.80% vs 30.97% for GRPZ. On fees, GRPZ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GRPZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBW or GRPZ?

Over the 1-year period, PBW has performed better with a 48.80% return vs 30.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBW or GRPZ?

GRPZ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBW or GRPZ?

PBW has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.87% for GRPZ.

What is the main difference between PBW and GRPZ?

PBW tracks The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX), while GRPZ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PBW and 0.35% for GRPZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.