PBSIX vs. NESGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX).
PBSIX is managed by Polen Capital. It was launched on Nov 1, 2017. NESGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on May 22, 2002.
Performance
PBSIX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBSIX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBSIX Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund | -3.41% | 12.05% | 3.75% | 21.83% | -42.90% | 16.44% | 50.02% | 21.22% | 1.96% | 1.42% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.51% | 10.50% | 12.76% | 5.68% | -30.21% | 10.59% | 71.90% | 54.42% | -5.43% | -3.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBSIX achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than NESGX's 9.51% return.
PBSIX
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -5.22%
- 1Y
- 21.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.94%
- 10Y*
- —
NESGX
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 47.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBSIX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBSIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBSIX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank
PBSIX
NESGX
PBSIX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBSIX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 1.32 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.88 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.38 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 8.02 | -3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBSIX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.32 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.02 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.51 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between PBSIX and NESGX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PBSIX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison
Neither PBSIX nor NESGX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBSIX Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 0.11% | 0.48% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.16% | 25.09% | 13.69% | 8.43% | 22.26% | 8.94% | 6.67% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
PBSIX vs. NESGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBSIX drawdown since its inception was -52.49%, roughly equal to the maximum NESGX drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSIX and NESGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBSIX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.49% | -50.29% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -17.27% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.49% | -50.05% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.09% | -9.15% | -20.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.76% | -11.74% | -10.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.64% | 5.13% | -0.49% |
Volatility
PBSIX vs. NESGX - Volatility Comparison
Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) have volatilities of 11.21% and 10.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBSIX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 10.96% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.38% | 22.87% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.18% | 35.07% | -3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 29.08% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.37% | 25.51% | +1.86% |