PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBSE vs. CPSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBSE vs. CPSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September (PBSE) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBSE achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than CPSP's 3.18% return.


PBSE

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.42%
YTD
4.31%
6M
5.00%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPSP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.74%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBSE vs. CPSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PBSE and CPSP is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.74

The correlation between PBSE and CPSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBSE vs. CPSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBSE
PBSE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSP
CPSP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CPSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSP Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBSE vs. CPSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September (PBSE) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBSECPSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

2.31

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

19.11

-15.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.83

96.35

-74.52

PBSE vs. CPSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is lower than the CPSP Sharpe Ratio of 5.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSE and CPSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBSECPSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

5.08

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

3.17

-1.60

Drawdowns

PBSE vs. CPSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSE drawdown since its inception was -8.35%, which is greater than CPSP's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSE and CPSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBSECPSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-1.73%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-0.37%

-2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-0.08%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.07%

+0.52%

Volatility

PBSE vs. CPSP - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September (PBSE) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) at 0.32%. This indicates that PBSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBSECPSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.32%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

0.84%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

1.42%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

2.37%

+4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.66%

2.37%

+4.29%

PBSE vs. CPSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBSE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSP's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBSE vs. CPSP - Dividend Comparison

Neither PBSE nor CPSP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PBSE and CPSP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBSE has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to CPSP (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSE dropped -8.35% vs CPSP's -1.73%.

On 1-year performance, PBSE leads with 12.86% vs 7.13% for CPSP. On fees, PBSE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CPSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBSE has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBSE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSP.

PBSE and CPSP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PBSE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CPSP is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBSE and 0.69% for CPSP.

CPSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBSE and CPSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer