PBQAX vs. PDBZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBQAX (PGIM Jennison Blend Fund) and PDBZX (PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - PBQAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by PGIM, while PDBZX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, PBQAX returned 15.65%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for PDBZX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. PBQAX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PDBZX.

Performance

PBQAX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Blend Fund (PBQAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBQAX achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PBQAX has outperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 15.65%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.

PBQAX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 12.23%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 25.98%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: 15.65%

PDBZX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 6.24%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 0.93%
• 10Y*: 2.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBQAX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBQAX PGIM Jennison Blend Fund	12.23%	12.23%	39.83%	27.48%	-24.86%	20.82%	27.11%	37.21%	-7.83%	21.58%
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z	0.72%	7.70%	2.87%	7.70%	-14.33%	-1.46%	8.01%	14.76%	-0.72%	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PBQAX and PDBZX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 1996	-0.08

The correlation between PBQAX and PDBZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PBQAX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBQAX

PBQAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
PBQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PBQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PBQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PBQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PBQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PDBZX

PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 27
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBQAX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Blend Fund (PBQAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBQAX	PDBZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.44	+0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	2.18	+0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.27	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	2.09	+0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.65	6.21	+7.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBQAX vs. PDBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the PDBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBQAX and PDBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBQAX	PDBZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	1.44	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.15	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.54	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	1.09	-0.54

Drawdowns

PBQAX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBQAX drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQAX and PDBZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBQAX	PDBZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.89%	-20.88%	-33.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-3.00%	-6.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.80%	-5.51%	-16.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.22%	-20.81%	-11.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.90%	-20.88%	-16.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.29%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-2.31%	-6.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.01%	+1.07%

Volatility

PBQAX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Blend Fund (PBQAX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) at 2.08%. This indicates that PBQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBQAX	PDBZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	2.08%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	3.30%	+7.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.86%	4.35%	+9.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.22%	6.05%	+14.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.47%	5.37%	+15.10%

PBQAX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBQAX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBQAX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison

PBQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.89%, more than PDBZX's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBQAX PGIM Jennison Blend Fund	8.89%	9.97%	26.50%	3.03%	1.93%	19.07%	7.79%	13.20%	12.89%	9.28%	6.82%	11.69%
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z	4.57%	4.54%	4.79%	4.60%	5.73%	2.73%	2.94%	10.36%	4.01%	2.87%	3.92%	3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBQAX and PDBZX in my portfolio?

PBQAX and PDBZX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBQAX or PDBZX?

PBQAX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to PDBZX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBQAX dropped -53.89% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.