PBOT vs. IBOT

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) and IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBOT is a Robotics fund actively managed by Pictet, while IBOT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar® Robotics Index. PBOT is actively managed, while IBOT is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBOT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBOT.

Performance

PBOT vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBOT achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than IBOT's 25.79% return.

PBOT

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -3.37%
• 6M: 27.50%
• YTD: 28.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBOT

• 1D: -2.07%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: 23.65%
• YTD: 25.79%
• 1Y: 42.12%
• 3Y*: 21.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBOT vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF	28.15%	0.33%
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	25.79%	3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PBOT and IBOT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

PBOT vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBOT

IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 67
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBOT vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBOT	IBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.83	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.48	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.63	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.53	—

Drawdowns

PBOT vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBOT drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, smaller than the maximum IBOT drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOT and IBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBOT	IBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.78%	-25.39%	+9.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.74%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.82%	-4.10%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.30%	-4.97%	+0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PBOT	IBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.89%	24.06%	+2.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.89%	22.64%	+4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.89%	22.64%	+4.25%

PBOT vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBOT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBOT vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison

PBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than IBOT's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	0.30%	0.38%	2.81%	2.06%
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF	0.07%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBOT and IBOT in my portfolio?

PBOT and IBOT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PBOT or IBOT?

On fees, IBOT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBOT or IBOT?

IBOT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PBOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBOT or IBOT?

IBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.07% for PBOT.

What is the main difference between PBOT and IBOT?

PBOT is categorized as Robotics, while IBOT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pictet and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PBOT and 0.47% for IBOT.