PBOT vs. AIQ
PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. PBOT is actively managed, while AIQ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBOT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
PBOT vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBOT achieves a 22.92% return, which is significantly higher than AIQ's 16.65% return.
PBOT
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 19.50%
- YTD
- 22.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 32.64%
- 3Y*
- 27.56%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $102.51M | $138.98M | $158.84M | |
| $23.32K | $22.92K | $19.40K |
PBOT vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 22.92% | 0.33% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 16.65% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBOT and AIQ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBOT vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIQ
PBOT vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBOT | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBOT vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBOT drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOT and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBOT | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -44.66% | +28.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.71% | -15.41% | +6.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -9.80% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.14% | — |
Volatility
PBOT vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBOT | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.94% | 27.94% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 26.31% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 25.93% | +1.01% |
PBOT vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBOT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBOT vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
PBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, which matches AIQ's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.08% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.08% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PBOT and AIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AIQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PBOT.
PBOT and AIQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.08%.
They also come from different issuers: Pictet and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PBOT and 0.68% for AIQ.
Find the right allocation for PBOT and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer