PBOG vs. FTXN
PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) and FTXN (First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBOG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index, while FTXN is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Oil & Gas Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBOG charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXN.
Performance
PBOG vs. FTXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PBOG having a 32.22% return and FTXN slightly higher at 32.57%.
PBOG
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 32.22%
- 6M
- 29.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXN
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 32.57%
- 6M
- 28.04%
- 1Y
- 39.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG vs. FTXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 32.22% | 1.62% |
FTXN First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | 32.57% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBOG and FTXN is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBOG vs. FTXN — Risk / Return Rank
PBOG
FTXN
PBOG vs. FTXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG) and First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF (FTXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBOG | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.31 | 0.28 | +3.03 |
Drawdowns
PBOG vs. FTXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBOG drawdown since its inception was -11.45%, smaller than the maximum FTXN drawdown of -73.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOG and FTXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBOG | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -73.49% | +62.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -7.47% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -19.24% | +16.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.84% | — |
Volatility
PBOG vs. FTXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBOG | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 22.98% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 29.67% | -6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 31.80% | -8.13% |
PBOG vs. FTXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBOG has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBOG vs. FTXN - Dividend Comparison
PBOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than FTXN's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXN First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | 2.04% | 2.83% | 2.51% | 3.41% | 2.26% | 1.04% | 1.76% | 2.72% | 2.16% | 1.78% | 0.20% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PBOG and FTXN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXN.
FTXN has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
PBOG is categorized as Oil & Gas, while FTXN is Energy Equities. PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index, while FTXN tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Oil & Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Blocks and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBOG and 0.60% for FTXN.
Find the right allocation for PBOG and FTXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer