PBOG vs. AVSF
PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) and AVSF (Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBOG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index, while AVSF is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Avantis. PBOG is passively managed, while AVSF is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. PBOG charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVSF.
Performance
PBOG vs. AVSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBOG achieves a 20.33% return, which is significantly higher than AVSF's 0.49% return.
PBOG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVSF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG vs. AVSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 20.33% | 1.39% |
AVSF Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF | 0.49% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBOG and AVSF is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBOG vs. AVSF — Risk / Return Rank
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVSF
PBOG vs. AVSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG) and Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBOG | AVSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBOG vs. AVSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBOG drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, which is greater than AVSF's maximum drawdown of -8.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOG and AVSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBOG | AVSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.46% | -8.85% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.19% | -0.49% | -14.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -2.19% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.39% | — |
Volatility
PBOG vs. AVSF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBOG | AVSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 1.92% | +22.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 2.66% | +21.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 2.53% | +21.42% |
PBOG vs. AVSF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBOG has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than AVSF's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PBOG vs. AVSF - Dividend Comparison
PBOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than AVSF's 4.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVSF Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF | 4.36% | 4.31% | 4.34% | 3.93% | 1.78% | 0.48% | 0.10% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBOG and AVSF have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVSF.
AVSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 0.14% for PBOG.
PBOG is categorized as Energy Equities, while AVSF is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Blocks and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBOG and 0.15% for AVSF.
Find the right allocation for PBOG and AVSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer