PBOC vs. PQAP

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

PBOC (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - October) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBOC returned 10.81% vs 18.59% for PQAP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

PBOC vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - October (PBOC) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBOC achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 11.58% return.

PBOC

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 4.99%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 10.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 11.58%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 1Y: 18.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBOC vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PBOC PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - October	4.99%	10.18%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	11.58%	14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PBOC and PQAP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.88

The correlation between PBOC and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PBOC vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBOC

PBOC Risk / Return Rank: 81
PBOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PBOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PBOC Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PBOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PBOC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBOC vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - October (PBOC) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBOC	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	3.76	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	5.85	-2.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.89	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	8.70	-5.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.89	48.90	-34.01

PBOC vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBOC and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBOC vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBOC drawdown since its inception was -8.33%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOC and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBOC	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.33%	-10.79%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.60%	-2.15%	-1.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.58%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.66%	-0.62%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	0.38%	+0.35%

Volatility

PBOC vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - October (PBOC) is 1.60%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that PBOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBOC	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.60%	2.73%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.09%	4.06%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.06%	4.98%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.85%	10.96%	-4.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.85%	10.96%	-4.11%

PBOC vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PBOC and PQAP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

PBOC vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

PBOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
PBOC PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBOC and PQAP in my portfolio?

PBOC and PQAP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBOC or PQAP?

PQAP has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to PBOC (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBOC dropped -8.33% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, PBOC or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 18.59% vs 10.81% for PBOC. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, PBOC has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBOC or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 18.59% return vs 10.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBOC or PQAP?

PBOC and PQAP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBOC or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for PBOC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.