PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBMR vs. OCTQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBMR vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PBMR

1D
0.20%
1M
1.41%
YTD
5.16%
6M
6.05%
1Y
13.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBMR vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBMR vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBMR
PBMR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PBMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PBMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBMR vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBMROCTQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.69

PBMR vs. OCTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBMROCTQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

Drawdowns

PBMR vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBMR drawdown since its inception was -7.64%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBMR and OCTQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBMROCTQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

0.00%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

Volatility

PBMR vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBMROCTQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

0.00%

+4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.60%

0.00%

+6.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.60%

0.00%

+6.60%

PBMR vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBMR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBMR vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither PBMR nor OCTQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PBMR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBMR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.

PBMR and OCTQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBMR and 0.79% for OCTQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBMR and OCTQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer