PBMR vs. BUFP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP).

PBMR and BUFP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PBMR is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Feb 29, 2024. BUFP is a passively managed fund by PGIM that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024.

Performance

PBMR vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PBMR vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PBMR PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March	-0.59%	10.89%	5.72%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	-1.34%	12.92%	6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBMR achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's -1.34% return.

PBMR

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.72%
• YTD: -0.59%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 10.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFP

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: -1.34%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 13.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBMR vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PBMR and BUFP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

PBMR

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March

BUFP

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

Return for Risk

PBMR vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBMR

PBMR Risk / Return Rank: 76
PBMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PBMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
PBMR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PBMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PBMR Martin Ratio Rank: 85

BUFP

BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 75
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBMR vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBMR	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.23	+0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	1.86	+0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.31	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	1.71	+0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.27	9.81	+0.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBMR vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBMR Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBMR and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBMR	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	1.23	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.40	1.02	+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between PBMR and BUFP is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PBMR vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

PBMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

	TTM	2025	2024
PBMR PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%

Drawdowns

PBMR vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBMR drawdown since its inception was -7.64%, smaller than the maximum BUFP drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBMR and BUFP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBMR	BUFP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-11.98%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.14%	-8.16%	+2.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-2.54%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-1.08%	+0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	1.42%	-0.39%

Volatility

PBMR vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) is 2.60%, while PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that PBMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBMR	BUFP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	3.41%	-0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.37%	4.99%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.06%	11.11%	-3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.77%	9.79%	-3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.77%	9.79%	-3.02%