PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBM vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PBM vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Psyence Biomedical Ltd (PBM) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBM achieves a -86.58% return, which is significantly lower than AGNC's 0.27% return.


PBM

1D
0.00%
1M
-40.96%
YTD
-86.58%
6M
-94.32%
1Y
-97.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGNC

1D
-0.29%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
0.27%
6M
3.92%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
6.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBM vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PBM
Psyence Biomedical Ltd
-86.58%-95.54%-99.41%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
0.27%34.92%8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PBM and AGNC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.13

The correlation between PBM and AGNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PBM:

$5.85M

AGNC:

$11.42B

EPS

PBM:

-$17.56

AGNC:

$1.33

PB Ratio

PBM:

0.49

AGNC:

1.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

PBM:

$0.00

AGNC:

$2.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PBM:

-$2.35K

AGNC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

PBM:

-$1.79M

AGNC:

$3.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBM vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBM
PBM Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBM Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBM vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Psyence Biomedical Ltd (PBM) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBMAGNCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.43

1.57

-2.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.65

2.18

-2.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.27

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

1.62

-2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.21

4.90

-6.11

PBM vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBM Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBM and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBMAGNCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

1.57

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

0.43

-0.91

Drawdowns

PBM vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBM drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBM and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBMAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-54.56%

-45.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.50%

-18.71%

-80.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-11.67%

-88.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.43%

-13.57%

-81.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

80.78%

6.17%

+74.61%

Volatility

PBM vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

Psyence Biomedical Ltd (PBM) has a higher volatility of 25.79% compared to AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) at 4.78%. This indicates that PBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBMAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.79%

4.78%

+21.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

221.86%

15.86%

+206.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

229.45%

19.35%

+210.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

203.59%

25.81%

+177.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.59%

25.38%

+178.21%

Dividends

PBM vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

PBM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
14.16%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
PBM
Psyence Biomedical Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PBM vs. AGNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Psyence Biomedical Ltd and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober202600
(PBM) Total Revenue
(AGNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PBM and AGNC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBM has higher volatility (25.79%) compared to AGNC (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBM dropped -100.00% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBM and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer