PBJL vs. PMJA
PBJL (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - July) and PMJA (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBJL returned 10.02% vs 6.53% for PMJA. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
PBJL vs. PMJA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBJL achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly higher than PMJA's 2.43% return.
PBJL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- 10.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMJA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBJL vs. PMJA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBJL PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - July | 4.38% | 11.82% |
PMJA PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January | 2.43% | 6.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBJL and PMJA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PBJL and PMJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBJL vs. PMJA — Risk / Return Rank
PBJL
PMJA
PBJL vs. PMJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - July (PBJL) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January (PMJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBJL | PMJA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.72 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 4.51 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.57 | 22.25 | -2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBJL vs. PMJA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBJL drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, which is greater than PMJA's maximum drawdown of -2.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJL and PMJA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBJL | PMJA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -2.98% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -1.45% | -1.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.05% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -0.33% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.29% | +0.22% |
Volatility
PBJL vs. PMJA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - July (PBJL) is 0.42%, while PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January (PMJA) has a volatility of 0.56%. This indicates that PBJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBJL | PMJA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 0.56% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.18% | 1.57% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 2.00% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 2.82% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 2.82% | +4.37% |
PBJL vs. PMJA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PBJL and PMJA have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
PBJL vs. PMJA - Dividend Comparison
Neither PBJL nor PMJA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PBJL and PMJA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMJA has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to PBJL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJL dropped -9.02% vs PMJA's -2.98%.
On 1-year performance, PBJL leads with 10.02% vs 6.53% for PMJA. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, PBJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PBJL has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBJL and PMJA have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
PBJL and PMJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PMJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBJL and PMJA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer