PBFDX vs. PAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX).
PBFDX is managed by Payson Funds. It was launched on Nov 25, 1991. PAGRX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990.
Performance
PBFDX vs. PAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBFDX vs. PAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBFDX Payson Total Return Fund | -6.41% | 21.20% | 21.77% | 25.65% | -14.60% | 30.84% | 20.49% | 31.67% | -1.79% | 21.76% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | -3.85% | 36.92% | 44.52% | 38.73% | -26.06% | 24.84% | 37.65% | 40.34% | -12.41% | 21.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBFDX achieves a -6.41% return, which is significantly lower than PAGRX's -3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PBFDX has underperformed PAGRX with an annualized return of 14.83%, while PAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.68% annualized return.
PBFDX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- YTD
- -6.41%
- 6M
- -2.80%
- 1Y
- 21.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
PAGRX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -3.85%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 39.42%
- 3Y*
- 34.02%
- 5Y*
- 17.10%
- 10Y*
- 18.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBFDX vs. PAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBFDX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGRX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBFDX vs. PAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
PBFDX
PAGRX
PBFDX vs. PAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBFDX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.55 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 2.25 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.59 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 13.26 | -6.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBFDX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.55 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.70 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.77 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between PBFDX and PAGRX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PBFDX vs. PAGRX - Dividend Comparison
PBFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than PAGRX's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBFDX Payson Total Return Fund | 2.01% | 1.95% | 10.67% | 4.68% | 2.34% | 13.07% | 7.59% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 4.98% | 1.15% | 4.81% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | 0.03% | 0.03% | 5.62% | 2.72% | 7.79% | 6.82% | 15.08% | 17.51% | 12.33% | 8.70% | 16.94% | 6.31% |
Drawdowns
PBFDX vs. PAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBFDX drawdown since its inception was -54.99%, roughly equal to the maximum PAGRX drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFDX and PAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBFDX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.99% | -55.87% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -13.80% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.17% | -36.52% | +14.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.02% | -38.01% | +4.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.93% | -9.14% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -10.09% | +3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.70% | +0.25% |
Volatility
PBFDX vs. PAGRX - Volatility Comparison
Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBFDX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 5.49% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 13.43% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 25.49% | -4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 24.49% | -6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 24.47% | -5.53% |