PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PBFDX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PBFDXFCNTX
YTD Return21.10%36.45%
1Y Return25.49%39.54%
3Y Return (Ann)4.26%2.67%
5Y Return (Ann)10.84%10.61%
10Y Return (Ann)9.02%8.93%
Sharpe Ratio1.832.53
Sortino Ratio2.533.42
Omega Ratio1.341.47
Calmar Ratio2.280.39
Martin Ratio10.5715.66
Ulcer Index2.45%2.49%
Daily Std Dev14.15%15.44%
Max Drawdown-56.40%-99.93%
Current Drawdown-1.98%-99.29%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between PBFDX and FCNTX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PBFDX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PBFDX achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 36.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PBFDX having a 9.02% annualized return and FCNTX not far behind at 8.93%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.56%
14.20%
PBFDX
FCNTX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PBFDX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBFDX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


PBFDX
Payson Total Return Fund
Expense ratio chart for PBFDX: current value at 0.82% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.82%
Expense ratio chart for FCNTX: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PBFDX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBFDX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PBFDX, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PBFDX, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PBFDX, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PBFDX, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PBFDX, currently valued at 10.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.57
FCNTX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 3.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 15.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.66

PBFDX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBFDX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.83
2.53
PBFDX
FCNTX

Dividends

PBFDX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

PBFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than FCNTX's 0.37% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PBFDX
Payson Total Return Fund
0.40%0.76%1.05%0.47%0.69%0.61%0.67%0.82%1.44%1.14%2.44%1.28%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
0.37%0.48%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.30%0.31%7.55%7.89%

Drawdowns

PBFDX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBFDX drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFDX and FCNTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.98%
-99.29%
PBFDX
FCNTX

Volatility

PBFDX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.43%
4.44%
PBFDX
FCNTX