PBEU vs. QABA
PBEU (Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF) and QABA (First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund) are both Financials Equities funds - PBEU tracks the BITA European Banks Index while QABA tracks the NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBEU charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QABA.
Performance
PBEU vs. QABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBEU achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly lower than QABA's 16.85% return.
PBEU
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QABA
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 5.99%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 26.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
PBEU vs. QABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 13.63% | 11.42% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 16.85% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBEU and QABA is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBEU vs. QABA — Risk / Return Rank
PBEU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QABA
PBEU vs. QABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBEU | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBEU vs. QABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBEU drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum QABA drawdown of -49.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBEU and QABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBEU | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | -49.30% | +32.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | 0.00% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -11.40% | +7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.99% | — |
Volatility
PBEU vs. QABA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBEU | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.63% | 22.55% | +5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 26.39% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 28.64% | -1.01% |
PBEU vs. QABA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBEU has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than QABA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBEU vs. QABA - Dividend Comparison
PBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QABA's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 2.22% | 2.52% | 2.37% | 2.71% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 1.90% | 1.42% | 1.13% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBEU and QABA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBEU is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBEU is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QABA.
QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.
PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index, while QABA tracks NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Block and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBEU and 0.60% for QABA.
Find the right allocation for PBEU and QABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer