PBEAX vs. PDBZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBEAX (PGIM Jennison Value Fund) and PDBZX (PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - PBEAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by PGIM, while PDBZX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, PBEAX returned 13.68%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for PDBZX. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. PBEAX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PDBZX.

Performance

PBEAX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBEAX achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PBEAX has outperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 13.68%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.

PBEAX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 29.66%
• 3Y*: 23.50%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

PDBZX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 6.24%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 0.93%
• 10Y*: 2.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBEAX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBEAX PGIM Jennison Value Fund	12.96%	16.38%	27.95%	14.54%	-8.68%	26.72%	2.75%	36.07%	-10.53%	16.31%
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z	0.72%	7.70%	2.87%	7.70%	-14.33%	-1.46%	8.01%	14.76%	-0.72%	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PBEAX and PDBZX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 1996	-0.10

The correlation between PBEAX and PDBZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PBEAX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBEAX

PBEAX Risk / Return Rank: 82
PBEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PBEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PBEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
PBEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PBEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

PDBZX

PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 27
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBEAX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBEAX	PDBZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	1.44	+1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	2.18	+1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.27	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	2.09	+1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.08	6.21	+9.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBEAX vs. PDBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBEAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the PDBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBEAX and PDBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBEAX	PDBZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77	1.44	+1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.15	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.54	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.09	-0.53

Drawdowns

PBEAX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBEAX drawdown since its inception was -58.23%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBEAX and PDBZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBEAX	PDBZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.23%	-20.88%	-37.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.99%	-3.00%	-4.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.29%	-5.51%	-10.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.02%	-20.81%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.31%	-20.88%	-17.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.29%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.97%	-2.31%	-5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.01%	+0.89%

Volatility

PBEAX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) at 2.08%. This indicates that PBEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBEAX	PDBZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.52%	2.08%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	3.30%	+5.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.04%	4.35%	+6.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	6.05%	+9.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.60%	5.37%	+12.23%

PBEAX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBEAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBEAX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison

PBEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, more than PDBZX's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBEAX PGIM Jennison Value Fund	8.95%	10.12%	14.05%	7.33%	8.28%	6.93%	4.01%	16.61%	10.18%	6.90%	4.26%	8.10%
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z	4.57%	4.54%	4.79%	4.60%	5.73%	2.73%	2.94%	10.36%	4.01%	2.87%	3.92%	3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBEAX and PDBZX in my portfolio?

PBEAX and PDBZX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBEAX or PDBZX?

PBEAX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to PDBZX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBEAX dropped -58.23% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.