PBDE vs. PSH
PBDE (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December) and PSH (PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBDE is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while PSH is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBDE returned 15.21% vs 6.11% for PSH. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBDE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PSH.
Performance
PBDE vs. PSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBDE achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly higher than PSH's 1.88% return.
PBDE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 4.81%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- 15.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSH
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBDE vs. PSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PBDE PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December | 4.81% | 11.87% | 5.01% |
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF | 1.88% | 7.34% | 5.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBDE and PSH is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PBDE and PSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBDE vs. PSH — Risk / Return Rank
PBDE
PSH
PBDE vs. PSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December (PBDE) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBDE | PSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.43 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 4.33 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.58 | 12.80 | +7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBDE | PSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.04 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 2.21 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
PBDE vs. PSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBDE drawdown since its inception was -8.73%, which is greater than PSH's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDE and PSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBDE | PSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -3.06% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.94% | -1.42% | -2.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.16% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -0.27% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 0.48% | +0.26% |
Volatility
PBDE vs. PSH - Volatility Comparison
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December (PBDE) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) at 0.69%. This indicates that PBDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBDE | PSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 0.69% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.08% | 2.10% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 3.02% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 3.26% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 3.26% | +3.89% |
PBDE vs. PSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBDE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PSH's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBDE vs. PSH - Dividend Comparison
PBDE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PBDE PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF | 6.66% | 6.62% | 8.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBDE and PSH have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBDE has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to PSH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBDE dropped -8.73% vs PSH's -3.06%.
On 1-year performance, PBDE leads with 15.21% vs 6.11% for PSH. On fees, PSH is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PBDE has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSH is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBDE.
PSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 0.00% for PBDE.
PBDE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PSH is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBDE and 0.45% for PSH.
PBDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBDE and PSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer