PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDE vs. MMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBDE vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December (PBDE) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDE achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly higher than MMAX's 3.09% return.


PBDE

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.81%
YTD
4.81%
6M
5.33%
1Y
15.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.60%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.75%
1Y
7.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBDE vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PBDE and MMAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.68

The correlation between PBDE and MMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBDE vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDE
PBDE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PBDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MMAX
MMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDE vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December (PBDE) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDEMMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

2.51

-0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

22.49

-18.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.58

112.49

-91.91

PBDE vs. MMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is lower than the MMAX Sharpe Ratio of 5.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDE and MMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDEMMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

5.52

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

3.13

-1.60

Drawdowns

PBDE vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDE drawdown since its inception was -8.73%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDE and MMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDEMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-1.93%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.94%

-0.34%

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.13%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-0.10%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

0.07%

+0.67%

Volatility

PBDE vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December (PBDE) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) at 0.36%. This indicates that PBDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDEMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.36%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

0.96%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.66%

1.39%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

2.49%

+4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.15%

2.49%

+4.66%

PBDE vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PBDE and MMAX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

PBDE vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison

PBDE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PBDE and MMAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDE has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to MMAX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBDE dropped -8.73% vs MMAX's -1.93%.

On 1-year performance, PBDE leads with 15.21% vs 7.67% for MMAX. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, MMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBDE has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBDE and MMAX have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for PBDE.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares.

MMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBDE and MMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer