PBBBX vs. PIAMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PBBBX (PIA BBB Bond Fund) and PIAMX (PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund) are both mutual funds - PBBBX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by PIA Mutual Funds, while PIAMX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by PIA Mutual Funds. Over the past 5 years, PBBBX returned 0.57%/yr vs 4.10%/yr for PIAMX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBBBX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for PIAMX.

Performance

PBBBX vs. PIAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIA BBB Bond Fund (PBBBX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBBBX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than PIAMX's 0.79% return.

PBBBX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 5.62%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

PIAMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 3.70%
• 3Y*: 7.53%
• 5Y*: 4.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBBBX vs. PIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PBBBX PIA BBB Bond Fund	0.13%	8.14%	2.41%	9.19%	-16.35%	-1.20%	9.37%	16.49%	-2.37%
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund	0.79%	2.34%	11.23%	16.38%	-10.93%	7.82%	9.05%	11.77%	-2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PBBBX and PIAMX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018	0.37

The correlation between PBBBX and PIAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PBBBX vs. PIAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBBBX

PBBBX Risk / Return Rank: 26
PBBBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PBBBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
PBBBX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PBBBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
PBBBX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

PIAMX

PIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 17
PIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
PIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBBBX vs. PIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA BBB Bond Fund (PBBBX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBBBX	PIAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.27	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.73	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.26	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.06	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.76	3.17	+2.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBBBX vs. PIAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBBBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the PIAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBBBX and PIAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBBBX	PIAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	1.27	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	1.02	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.22	-0.47

Drawdowns

PBBBX vs. PIAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBBBX drawdown since its inception was -23.00%, which is greater than PIAMX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBBBX and PIAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBBBX	PIAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.00%	-18.15%	-4.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.30%	-3.75%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.39%	-6.17%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.00%	-13.92%	-9.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-0.55%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-2.34%	-1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	1.25%	-0.20%

Volatility

PBBBX vs. PIAMX - Volatility Comparison

PIA BBB Bond Fund (PBBBX) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) at 0.68%. This indicates that PBBBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBBBX	PIAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	0.68%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.05%	2.43%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.14%	3.12%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.69%	4.04%	+2.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.02%	4.23%	+1.79%

PBBBX vs. PIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBBBX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PIAMX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PBBBX vs. PIAMX - Dividend Comparison

PBBBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than PIAMX's 7.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBBBX PIA BBB Bond Fund	3.79%	4.02%	3.82%	3.57%	3.24%	2.85%	3.16%	3.78%	4.20%	3.75%	3.95%	4.12%
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund	7.90%	9.12%	8.49%	8.12%	7.99%	8.64%	6.63%	6.96%	7.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBBBX and PIAMX in my portfolio?

PBBBX and PIAMX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBBBX or PIAMX?

PBBBX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to PIAMX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBBBX dropped -23.00% vs PIAMX's -18.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBBBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.