PBAP vs. PHEQ
PBAP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April) and PHEQ (Parametric Hedged Equity ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBAP returned 13.68% vs 15.97% for PHEQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBAP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PHEQ.
Performance
PBAP vs. PHEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBAP achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly higher than PHEQ's 5.67% return.
PBAP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHEQ
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.67%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBAP vs. PHEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April | 6.83% | 6.34% | 8.88% |
PHEQ Parametric Hedged Equity ETF | 5.67% | 11.76% | 10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBAP and PHEQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between PBAP and PHEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBAP vs. PHEQ — Risk / Return Rank
PBAP
PHEQ
PBAP vs. PHEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) and Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBAP | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.41 | 2.62 | +1.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.56 | 3.92 | +3.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.20 | 1.52 | +0.68 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.84 | 3.77 | +8.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 85.46 | 17.21 | +68.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBAP | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41 | 2.62 | +1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.46 | 1.80 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
PBAP vs. PHEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBAP drawdown since its inception was -9.70%, smaller than the maximum PHEQ drawdown of -12.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBAP and PHEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBAP | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.70% | -12.55% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | -4.26% | +3.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -0.97% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | 0.93% | -0.77% |
Volatility
PBAP vs. PHEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) is 0.59%, while Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that PBAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBAP | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 1.05% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | 4.56% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11% | 6.16% | -3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 8.62% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 8.62% | -1.51% |
PBAP vs. PHEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PHEQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBAP vs. PHEQ - Dividend Comparison
PBAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHEQ Parametric Hedged Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBAP and PHEQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHEQ has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to PBAP (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBAP dropped -9.70% vs PHEQ's -12.55%.
On 1-year performance, PHEQ leads with 15.97% vs 13.68% for PBAP. On fees, PHEQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBAP has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PHEQ has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 13.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PHEQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBAP.
PHEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for PBAP.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBAP and 0.29% for PHEQ.
PBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.41 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBAP and PHEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer