PBAP vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

PBAP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBAP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by PGIM, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. PBAP is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, PBAP returned 12.15% vs 64.31% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. PBAP charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

PBAP vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBAP achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 23.84% return.

PBAP

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.87%
• 6M: 7.15%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 1Y: 12.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: -3.81%
• 1M: -2.41%
• 6M: 34.02%
• YTD: 23.84%
• 1Y: 64.31%
• 3Y*: -31.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBAP vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April	7.44%	6.34%	8.86%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	23.84%	-1.76%	-33.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PBAP and BITI is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	-0.37

Return for Risk

PBAP vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBAP

PBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBAP vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBAP	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.73	1.46	+2.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.18	2.03	+4.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.95	1.24	+0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.42	2.56	+7.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	62.42	6.37	+56.05

PBAP vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBAP Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBAP and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBAP vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBAP drawdown since its inception was -9.70%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBAP and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBAP	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.70%	-92.16%	+82.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.17%	-25.28%	+24.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-86.48%	+86.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.76%	-68.36%	+67.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	10.13%	-9.93%

Volatility

PBAP vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) is 1.14%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that PBAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBAP	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	11.73%	-10.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.44%	34.49%	-32.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.27%	44.24%	-40.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.99%	52.29%	-45.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.99%	52.29%	-45.30%

PBAP vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBAP vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

PBAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.70%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBAP and BITI in my portfolio?

PBAP and BITI have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBAP or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to PBAP (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBAP dropped -9.70% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, PBAP or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.31% vs 12.15% for PBAP. On fees, PBAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBAP or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.31% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBAP or BITI?

PBAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBAP or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.70%, compared with 0.00% for PBAP.

What is the main difference between PBAP and BITI?

PBAP is categorized as Options Trading, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBAP and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.