PBAMX vs. URTRX
PBAMX (Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund) and URTRX (USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PBAMX returned 9.87%/yr vs 6.58%/yr for URTRX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PBAMX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for URTRX.
Performance
PBAMX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PBAMX having a 8.54% return and URTRX slightly lower at 8.16%.
PBAMX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
URTRX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 18.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
PBAMX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBAMX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund | 8.54% | 16.68% | 13.83% | 24.49% | -15.93% | 16.47% | 13.78% |
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 8.16% | 14.78% | 8.09% | 13.98% | -13.23% | 12.23% | 8.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBAMX and URTRX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PBAMX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBAMX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank
PBAMX
URTRX
PBAMX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund (PBAMX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBAMX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.48 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 3.44 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.50 | 14.88 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBAMX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.54 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.68 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.61 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
PBAMX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBAMX drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, smaller than the maximum URTRX drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBAMX and URTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBAMX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.57% | -34.10% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -5.29% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.67% | -9.12% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.81% | -19.52% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -4.15% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 1.22% | +0.19% |
Volatility
PBAMX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund (PBAMX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) have volatilities of 2.57% and 2.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBAMX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 2.54% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.91% | 5.81% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 7.15% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.27% | 9.69% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 10.35% | +4.27% |
PBAMX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBAMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBAMX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison
PBAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than URTRX's 6.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBAMX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund | 10.61% | 11.51% | 7.46% | 3.34% | 12.96% | 14.65% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 6.27% | 6.78% | 3.16% | 4.24% | 9.53% | 7.66% | 4.53% | 11.43% | 8.54% | 8.10% | 4.06% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PBAMX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PBAMX has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to URTRX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBAMX dropped -27.57% vs URTRX's -34.10%.
URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBAMX and URTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer